Watch Kutumb Episodes Free Online

Take a citizen by the hand ...

"Funny" convergence between the UMP and the Socialist Party this morning.

• The President of the Republic ("the ultra super plus super neoliberal American", it seems) "concerned about the low wage, compared to significant amounts of dividends paid by companies to their shareholders, considering that it was "more tolerable" (lol). Source Boursorama . He wants a raise of the employee participation and s Uggeri to block a certain amount of dividends paid .
• The Socialist Party, he moved to regulate rents for relocation in the tense areas where prices are more expensive (source: Libération) . This is a proposal by the Socialist MP Parisian Sandrine Mazetier , who rented a council flat in Paris from 85 m² to 1,350 € from 1997 to 2008 before buying at the top (?) Of the bubble .

Why the Gospel according to St. Marx?

Most likely because the changing purchasing power and inequality are among the concerns of French , if one believes the TNS Sofres Cross Covea . Frankly, if you nodded to the problem of purchasing power, we can ask questions about the reality of concern vis a vis social inequalities. Why? Because the French detest the CEO or overpaid traders but lionized singers or footballers millionaires.
It does not make sense.

Gabriel Heinze (Olympique Marseille) 4.5 million
Franck Riboud (Danone): 4.4 million
Lucho Gonzales (Olympique Marseille) 4.3 million
Lissandro Lopez (Olympique Lyonnais) 4.1 million
Bernard Arnault (LVMH): 3.9 million
Ludovic Guily (Paris Saint Germain) 3.1 million euros
Christophe de Margerie (Total): 2.6 million
Marion Cotillard 2.35 million euros
Fernando Morientes (Olympique Marseille) 2.4 million
Jean Dujardin 2.3 million euros
Didier Deschamps (Marseille) 2.2 million
Gerard Depardieu 2 million euros
Franck Dubosc 1.74 million euros
Michael Youn 1.7 euros
Xavier Fontanet (Essilor) 1.6 million euros
Vanessa Paradis 1.3 million euros
Pierre-Andre de Chalendar (Saint-Gobain): 1.3 million euros
Mathilde Seigner 1 million
André-Jacques Auberton-Hervé (Soitec) 574 000
Jacques Chirac, retired 372 000 EUR
DSK 305 553 euros, excluding expenses
François Fillon 266 988 euro (excluding: 6037 euros per month for monthly allowance for expenses of employment + Free access to the network SNCF + Quotas air travel + Provision of Fleet Expenses telephone and e + + Company car and driver + Accommodation function at Matignon + Secondary residence (the Lantern in Versailles, Yvelines, and the Chateau de Champs-sur-Marne)
average bonus of a French bank trader in 242,000 euros in 2010 that 1 / 3 now and 2 / 3 Deferred before income tax + 50% tax on bonuses of market

(Sources: Le Figaro , the Journal du Net , SPORTUNIT , Expansion , Capital No. 212: The Real Income From Our Elected)

dividends, it will be recalled that this is simply the counterpart of the detention of capital. You buy a share if the box is making money, it may pay a dividend. To receive a dividend, we must have bought a share ... (Or received). Dividends are not reserved to the CAC 40. Any return on capital, even that of the grocery store down, not say Arab area, is a dividend. But if we do not just look at the CAC 40 companies and one of its emblematic Sanofi-Aventis (was this:

- employees paid 5.1 billion directly at 101 000 50 495 employees or EUROZ, including social charges, per person
- 3 billion dividend paid to ; 310 997 785 shares held by shareholders is approximately 500 000 6000 euros on average per shareholder.

It is true that the government is doing everything to discourage investment in shares. Simply, if its purpose is to attack excessive profits, it misses the target. Once again, a good butcher is more profitable than the 8% margin Total net. Will we also nationalize the butchers?

As for rent control is actually an idea. Unless it has already been tested: It's called Act 48. It ended with a deficit of construction. If one truly wishes that people can stay in one place at affordable prices, we must provide affordable housing so the build. Public authorities should therefore build public housing directly and accept low rents. Concern: to build, it takes field. Only an authoritarian political expropriation followed by a massive nationalization of savings is able to give the state the means to its goal of housing accessible to all. Is this what we want?

UMP and PS seem to agree that given the life that is too hard, a sort of big brother state must take care of everything to lower rents, prevent certain to win money, etc..

Otherwise, there Alternative Liberal and policy truth which is that, yes, living in the sixth district, next door to Jospin, it's expensive, and, yes the opportunities, skills, opportunities and desires of each other succeed inequalities in wealth and income. Accept these inequalities while creating conditions of equal opportunities, rather than engaging in planes that have collapse in the rubble of the Berlin Wall in 1989